Microsoft Agent Framework: An Engineering Perspective
Microsoft has released the Agent Framework as the direct successor to Semantic Kernel and AutoGen, consolidating the agent-building work that has accumulated across the company's AI tooling. For teams building .NET libraries, which is what we do at Iron Software, this release is worth a close look. Agent frameworks are fundamentally about giving LLMs the ability to use tools, and the tools agents end up calling are, in practice, libraries.
Here is what stood out to us in the overview, and how we are thinking about it from a library author's seat.
What the Agent Framework is
The framework provides two primary capabilities. Agents are individual LLM-driven workers that process input, call tools and MCP servers, and generate responses. Workflows are graph-based orchestrations that connect multiple agents and functions with type-safe routing, checkpointing, and human-in-the-loop support.
Around those two surfaces, the framework offers the building blocks teams have come to expect from enterprise AI tooling: model clients across Azure OpenAI, OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, and Microsoft Foundry; session-based state management; context providers for memory; middleware for intercepting agent actions; and MCP clients for tool integration.
The "successor to Semantic Kernel and AutoGen" framing matters. Microsoft is consolidating rather than adding another framework to the menu. For teams that have been waiting to commit to a .NET agent stack, this is now a clearer answer.
The most underrated line in the documentation
Tucked into the section on when to use agents versus workflows is a sentence that does more work than the rest of the page:
If you can write a function to handle the task, do that instead of using an AI agent.
This is the honest engineering framing, and it should be the starting point for every conversation about agent adoption. Agents are not magic. They are LLMs with the ability to choose which tool to call and in what order. When the task is deterministic, a function is faster, cheaper, and more reliable. Agents earn their place when the path through the task is genuinely open-ended.
For library teams, this is the green light. Our libraries are the functions that agents call when they delegate work. The framework does not replace library code; it depends on it.
Where .NET libraries fit in
Tools are the connective tissue between an agent and the work the user actually wants done. When an agent decides that "this user wants a PDF generated from the data we just summarized," it does not generate the PDF itself. It calls a tool that does.
Most useful tools in a production AI application reduce to operations on documents, data, or external systems. For .NET teams working in the document-processing space, that maps directly to libraries such as IronPDF, IronOCR, and IronXL. A concrete example using IronPDF wrapped as a function an agent can call:
[Description("Generates a PDF from HTML content and saves it to disk")]
public static string GenerateHtmlPdf(
[Description("The HTML content to render")] string html,
[Description("The output file path")] string outputPath)
{
var renderer = new ChromePdfRenderer();
using var pdf = renderer.RenderHtmlAsPdf(html);
pdf.SaveAs(outputPath);
return $"PDF saved to {outputPath}";
}[Description("Generates a PDF from HTML content and saves it to disk")]
public static string GenerateHtmlPdf(
[Description("The HTML content to render")] string html,
[Description("The output file path")] string outputPath)
{
var renderer = new ChromePdfRenderer();
using var pdf = renderer.RenderHtmlAsPdf(html);
pdf.SaveAs(outputPath);
return $"PDF saved to {outputPath}";
}Imports System.ComponentModel
<Description("Generates a PDF from HTML content and saves it to disk")>
Public Shared Function GenerateHtmlPdf(
<Description("The HTML content to render")> html As String,
<Description("The output file path")> outputPath As String) As String
Dim renderer = New ChromePdfRenderer()
Using pdf = renderer.RenderHtmlAsPdf(html)
pdf.SaveAs(outputPath)
End Using
Return $"PDF saved to {outputPath}"
End FunctionRegister this function as a tool with an agent, and the agent now has the ability to produce styled PDF reports on demand. The same pattern applies to OCR (extracting text from a scanned document), spreadsheet operations (reading or writing XLSX data), and document conversion. Each library exposes a capability, and each capability becomes an agent tool.
Workflows for document pipelines
The workflows surface deserves a separate look. Document processing in production is rarely a single step. A typical real-world pipeline looks like: OCR the scanned invoice, extract structured fields, validate them against business rules, write the validated data to an Excel ledger, and generate a PDF receipt for the customer.
That sequence maps cleanly onto a graph-based workflow with type-safe routing between steps. Each node is a function or agent, each transition has well-defined input and output types, and the workflow supports checkpointing for long-running operations and human review at any step.
For teams that have been hand-rolling this orchestration in custom code, the workflows surface is the part of the Agent Framework most worth investigating.
For teams that need PDF, OCR, Excel, Word, or barcode capabilities to back tool calls or workflow nodes, the Iron Suite provides production-tested implementations of all five. Start a free trial, no credit card required.
Limitations and considerations
A few things worth keeping in mind before committing:
- The framework is new. It consolidates mature concepts from Semantic Kernel and AutoGen, but the consolidated API surface is itself recent. APIs will continue to evolve.
- Third-party model and tool risk. Microsoft's own documentation is explicit that any third-party systems you integrate (non-Azure models, external agents, third-party tools) remain your responsibility for data handling, cost, and security. This is the right framing, and worth reading carefully.
- Production guardrails are still your responsibility. Content filters, responsible-AI mitigations, telemetry, and quality testing for your specific use case are not provided by the framework. It gives you the building blocks; the system around them is yours to build.
Summary
The Microsoft Agent Framework is a credible consolidation of the company's AI-agent work, arriving at a moment when .NET teams are looking for a stable foundation to build production AI applications on. Its most important framing is also its most overlooked: agents are most useful when wrapped around the functions and libraries that actually do the work.
For library teams, that is the position we have been waiting for.
