Text Control vs IronPDF: Technical Comparison Guide
When .NET developers evaluate PDF generation libraries, two solutions frequently emerge in enterprise discussions: TX Text Control and IronPDF. While both can produce PDF output, they represent fundamentally different architectural philosophies. This technical comparison examines both libraries to help architects and developers make informed decisions for their .NET applications.
Understanding TX Text Control
TX Text Control is a comprehensive document editor component that emphasizes DOCX editing capabilities with embedded UI controls. PDF generation exists as a secondary feature within its broader document processing architecture. The platform provides extensive document editing functionality, making it suitable for applications requiring rich text editing interfaces.
However, this comprehensive nature introduces considerations that development teams should evaluate carefully:
- Expensive Licensing: TX Text Control operates on a commercial license starting at $3,398+ per developer, with mandatory 40% annual renewals required to maintain access to updates
- PDF as Secondary Feature: The core architecture prioritizes word processing over PDF generation, treating PDF output as an add-on capability
- Known Hardware Issues: Documented Intel Iris Xe Graphics rendering bugs affecting 11th generation Intel processors require registry workarounds
- Bloated Dependencies: Includes document editing UI components that may be unnecessary for PDF-focused workflows
- Complex API: Requires ServerTextControl context management and selection model patterns
Understanding IronPDF
IronPDF takes a fundamentally different approach by focusing primarily on PDF generation without layering UI components or DOCX editing tools. The library stands out for its lean, tailored design specifically optimized for PDF generation and manipulation, making it highly efficient as a PDF-first architecture tool.
Key characteristics of IronPDF include:
- PDF-First Architecture: Designed from the ground up for PDF generation, offering robust document creation and rendering capabilities
- Chromium Rendering Engine: Leverages modern HTML5 and CSS3 standards with full JavaScript execution support
- Cost Efficiency: One-time licensing model eliminates ongoing subscription costs
- Proven Stability: Documented reliability across various hardware configurations, avoiding platform-specific rendering issues
- Simple Integration: No context management or complex initialization patterns required
Pricing Comparison
The licensing structures between TextControl and IronPDF reveal significant cost differences over time:
| Aspect | TX Text Control | IronPDF |
|---|---|---|
| Base License | $3,398+ per developer | $749 one-time per developer |
| Annual Renewal | 40% mandatory | Optional support |
| Team of 4 (Year 1) | ~$6,749 | ~$2,996 |
| Total 3-Year Cost | $5,750+ per developer | $749 per developer |
| UI Components | Bundled (potential bloat) | PDF-focused only |
| Server Runtime | Additional licensing | Included |
Feature Comparison
The following table highlights the technical differences between TextControl and IronPDF across key dimensions:
| Feature | TX Text Control | IronPDF |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Focus | DOCX editing | PDF generation |
| PDF Quality | Basic, add-on feature | High, core functionality |
| HTML to PDF | Yes (secondary) | Yes (primary) |
| CSS Support | Limited | Full CSS3 |
| JavaScript Execution | Limited | Full ES2024 |
| URL to PDF | Complex setup required | Native support |
| Headers/Footers | Complex API | Simple HTML-based |
| Mail Merge | Proprietary system | HTML templates |
| PDF/A Compliance | Yes | Yes |
| Password Protection | Yes | Yes |
| Digital Signatures | Yes | Yes |
| Merge PDFs | Limited | Supported |
| Split PDFs | Limited | Supported |
| Watermarks | Complex implementation | Simple HTML/CSS |
| Hardware Compatibility | Known Intel Iris issues | Stable across all devices |
| Context Management | Required | Not needed |
| Cross-Platform | Windows-focused | Yes |
API Architecture Differences
A critical distinction between TextControl and IronPDF lies in their API design philosophies and initialization patterns.
TextControl Approach
TextControl requires explicit context management through the ServerTextControl class. Every operation must occur within a using block after calling Create():
// NuGet: Install-Package TXTextControl.Server
using TXTextControl;
using System.IO;
namespace TextControlExample
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
using (ServerTextControl textControl = new ServerTextControl())
{
textControl.Create();
string html = "<html><body><h1>Hello World</h1><p>This is a PDF document.</p></body></html>";
textControl.Load(html, StreamType.HTMLFormat);
textControl.Save("output.pdf", StreamType.AdobePDF);
}
}
}
}// NuGet: Install-Package TXTextControl.Server
using TXTextControl;
using System.IO;
namespace TextControlExample
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
using (ServerTextControl textControl = new ServerTextControl())
{
textControl.Create();
string html = "<html><body><h1>Hello World</h1><p>This is a PDF document.</p></body></html>";
textControl.Load(html, StreamType.HTMLFormat);
textControl.Save("output.pdf", StreamType.AdobePDF);
}
}
}
}This pattern requires understanding TextControl-specific classes, stream types, and the context lifecycle.
IronPDF Approach
IronPDF eliminates context management entirely. The ChromePdfRenderer class provides a stateless API that developers can use immediately:
// NuGet: Install-Package IronPdf
using IronPdf;
namespace IronPdfExample
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var renderer = new ChromePdfRenderer();
string html = "<html><body><h1>Hello World</h1><p>This is a PDF document.</p></body></html>";
var pdf = renderer.RenderHtmlAsPdf(html);
pdf.SaveAs("output.pdf");
}
}
}// NuGet: Install-Package IronPdf
using IronPdf;
namespace IronPdfExample
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var renderer = new ChromePdfRenderer();
string html = "<html><body><h1>Hello World</h1><p>This is a PDF document.</p></body></html>";
var pdf = renderer.RenderHtmlAsPdf(html);
pdf.SaveAs("output.pdf");
}
}
}For comprehensive guidance on HTML conversion capabilities, see the HTML to PDF tutorial.
API Mapping Reference
Teams evaluating a transition from TextControl to IronPDF will find this mapping helpful for understanding concept equivalences:
| TX Text Control | IronPDF |
|---|---|
ServerTextControl.Create() | new ChromePdfRenderer() |
tx.Load(html, StreamType.HTMLFormat) | renderer.RenderHtmlAsPdf(html) |
tx.Load(url, StreamType.HTMLFormat) | renderer.RenderUrlAsPdf(url) |
tx.Save(path, StreamType.AdobePDF) | pdf.SaveAs(path) |
SaveSettings.PDFAConformance | RenderingOptions.PdfAFormat |
DocumentServer.MailMerge | HTML templates + Razor |
DocumentTarget.HeadersAndFooters | HtmlHeaderFooter |
LoadSettings | RenderingOptions |
StreamType.AdobePDF | Default output |
Merging PDF Documents
Document merging represents a common requirement where implementation complexity differs between the two libraries.
TextControl Implementation
TextControl requires loading documents sequentially with explicit append mode flags:
// NuGet: Install-Package TXTextControl.Server
using TXTextControl;
using System.IO;
namespace TextControlExample
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
using (ServerTextControl textControl = new ServerTextControl())
{
textControl.Create();
byte[] pdf1 = File.ReadAllBytes("document1.pdf");
textControl.Load(pdf1, StreamType.AdobePDF);
byte[] pdf2 = File.ReadAllBytes("document2.pdf");
textControl.Load(pdf2, StreamType.AdobePDF, LoadAppendMode.Append);
textControl.Save("merged.pdf", StreamType.AdobePDF);
}
}
}
}// NuGet: Install-Package TXTextControl.Server
using TXTextControl;
using System.IO;
namespace TextControlExample
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
using (ServerTextControl textControl = new ServerTextControl())
{
textControl.Create();
byte[] pdf1 = File.ReadAllBytes("document1.pdf");
textControl.Load(pdf1, StreamType.AdobePDF);
byte[] pdf2 = File.ReadAllBytes("document2.pdf");
textControl.Load(pdf2, StreamType.AdobePDF, LoadAppendMode.Append);
textControl.Save("merged.pdf", StreamType.AdobePDF);
}
}
}
}IronPDF Implementation
IronPDF provides a dedicated static method for merging that accepts multiple documents:
// NuGet: Install-Package IronPdf
using IronPdf;
namespace IronPdfExample
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var pdf1 = PdfDocument.FromFile("document1.pdf");
var pdf2 = PdfDocument.FromFile("document2.pdf");
var merged = PdfDocument.Merge(pdf1, pdf2);
merged.SaveAs("merged.pdf");
}
}
}// NuGet: Install-Package IronPdf
using IronPdf;
namespace IronPdfExample
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var pdf1 = PdfDocument.FromFile("document1.pdf");
var pdf2 = PdfDocument.FromFile("document2.pdf");
var merged = PdfDocument.Merge(pdf1, pdf2);
merged.SaveAs("merged.pdf");
}
}
}The PdfDocument.Merge method accepts any number of documents and returns a new combined PDF without requiring context management or manual byte array handling.
Headers, Footers, and Page Numbering
Adding headers and footers with dynamic page numbers demonstrates significant API complexity differences.
TextControl Implementation
TextControl requires section-based header/footer manipulation with explicit type declarations:
// NuGet: Install-Package TXTextControl.Server
using TXTextControl;
using System.IO;
namespace TextControlExample
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
using (ServerTextControl textControl = new ServerTextControl())
{
textControl.Create();
string html = "<html><body><h1>Document Content</h1><p>Main body text.</p></body></html>";
textControl.Load(html, StreamType.HTMLFormat);
HeaderFooter header = new HeaderFooter(HeaderFooterType.Header);
header.Text = "Document Header";
textControl.Sections[0].HeadersAndFooters.Add(header);
HeaderFooter footer = new HeaderFooter(HeaderFooterType.Footer);
footer.Text = "Page {page} of {numpages}";
textControl.Sections[0].HeadersAndFooters.Add(footer);
textControl.Save("output.pdf", StreamType.AdobePDF);
}
}
}
}// NuGet: Install-Package TXTextControl.Server
using TXTextControl;
using System.IO;
namespace TextControlExample
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
using (ServerTextControl textControl = new ServerTextControl())
{
textControl.Create();
string html = "<html><body><h1>Document Content</h1><p>Main body text.</p></body></html>";
textControl.Load(html, StreamType.HTMLFormat);
HeaderFooter header = new HeaderFooter(HeaderFooterType.Header);
header.Text = "Document Header";
textControl.Sections[0].HeadersAndFooters.Add(header);
HeaderFooter footer = new HeaderFooter(HeaderFooterType.Footer);
footer.Text = "Page {page} of {numpages}";
textControl.Sections[0].HeadersAndFooters.Add(footer);
textControl.Save("output.pdf", StreamType.AdobePDF);
}
}
}
}IronPDF Implementation
IronPDF offers streamlined methods for adding text-based headers and footers:
// NuGet: Install-Package IronPdf
using IronPdf;
using IronPdf.Rendering;
namespace IronPdfExample
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var renderer = new ChromePdfRenderer();
string html = "<html><body><h1>Document Content</h1><p>Main body text.</p></body></html>";
var pdf = renderer.RenderHtmlAsPdf(html);
pdf.AddTextHeader("Document Header");
pdf.AddTextFooter("Page {page} of {total-pages}");
pdf.SaveAs("output.pdf");
}
}
}// NuGet: Install-Package IronPdf
using IronPdf;
using IronPdf.Rendering;
namespace IronPdfExample
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var renderer = new ChromePdfRenderer();
string html = "<html><body><h1>Document Content</h1><p>Main body text.</p></body></html>";
var pdf = renderer.RenderHtmlAsPdf(html);
pdf.AddTextHeader("Document Header");
pdf.AddTextFooter("Page {page} of {total-pages}");
pdf.SaveAs("output.pdf");
}
}
}For more complex header designs, IronPDF also supports the HtmlHeaderFooter class that accepts full HTML and CSS styling:
renderer.RenderingOptions.HtmlHeader = new HtmlHeaderFooter
{
HtmlFragment = @"
<div style='width: 100%; text-align: center; font-size: 12pt;'>
Company Report
</div>",
MaxHeight = 30
};
renderer.RenderingOptions.HtmlFooter = new HtmlHeaderFooter
{
HtmlFragment = @"
<div style='width: 100%; text-align: right; font-size: 10pt;'>
Page {page} of {total-pages}
</div>",
MaxHeight = 25
};renderer.RenderingOptions.HtmlHeader = new HtmlHeaderFooter
{
HtmlFragment = @"
<div style='width: 100%; text-align: center; font-size: 12pt;'>
Company Report
</div>",
MaxHeight = 30
};
renderer.RenderingOptions.HtmlFooter = new HtmlHeaderFooter
{
HtmlFragment = @"
<div style='width: 100%; text-align: right; font-size: 10pt;'>
Page {page} of {total-pages}
</div>",
MaxHeight = 25
};URL to PDF Conversion
Converting live web pages to PDF reveals architectural differences in how each library handles web content.
TextControl Approach
TextControl requires manual URL loading through its HTML format handler, which provides limited CSS and JavaScript support:
using (ServerTextControl tx = new ServerTextControl())
{
tx.Create();
LoadSettings loadSettings = new LoadSettings();
loadSettings.ApplicationFieldFormat = ApplicationFieldFormat.MSWord;
tx.Load("https://example.com/invoice", StreamType.HTMLFormat, loadSettings);
SaveSettings saveSettings = new SaveSettings();
saveSettings.PDFAConformance = PDFAConformance.PDFa1b;
tx.Save("output.pdf", StreamType.AdobePDF, saveSettings);
}using (ServerTextControl tx = new ServerTextControl())
{
tx.Create();
LoadSettings loadSettings = new LoadSettings();
loadSettings.ApplicationFieldFormat = ApplicationFieldFormat.MSWord;
tx.Load("https://example.com/invoice", StreamType.HTMLFormat, loadSettings);
SaveSettings saveSettings = new SaveSettings();
saveSettings.PDFAConformance = PDFAConformance.PDFa1b;
tx.Save("output.pdf", StreamType.AdobePDF, saveSettings);
}IronPDF Approach
IronPDF provides native URL rendering through its Chromium engine, executing JavaScript and applying all styles:
var renderer = new ChromePdfRenderer();
// PDF/A compliance - simple property
renderer.RenderingOptions.PdfAFormat = PdfAVersions.PdfA1B;
var pdf = renderer.RenderUrlAsPdf("https://example.com/invoice");
pdf.SaveAs("output.pdf");var renderer = new ChromePdfRenderer();
// PDF/A compliance - simple property
renderer.RenderingOptions.PdfAFormat = PdfAVersions.PdfA1B;
var pdf = renderer.RenderUrlAsPdf("https://example.com/invoice");
pdf.SaveAs("output.pdf");The RenderUrlAsPdf method captures the complete rendered page including dynamically generated content, making it ideal for modern web applications built with frameworks like React, Angular, or Vue.js.
Page Settings and Configuration
Configuring page dimensions, margins, and orientation shows different approaches to document settings.
TextControl Implementation
TextControl uses section-based page settings with measurements in TWIPS:
using (ServerTextControl tx = new ServerTextControl())
{
tx.Create();
tx.Load(html, StreamType.HTMLFormat);
// Complex page settings through sections
foreach (Section section in tx.Sections)
{
section.Format.PageSize = PageSize.A4;
section.Format.PageMargins = new PageMargins(
1440, 1440, 1440, 1440); // TWIPS
section.Format.Landscape = true;
}
tx.Save("output.pdf", StreamType.AdobePDF);
}using (ServerTextControl tx = new ServerTextControl())
{
tx.Create();
tx.Load(html, StreamType.HTMLFormat);
// Complex page settings through sections
foreach (Section section in tx.Sections)
{
section.Format.PageSize = PageSize.A4;
section.Format.PageMargins = new PageMargins(
1440, 1440, 1440, 1440); // TWIPS
section.Format.Landscape = true;
}
tx.Save("output.pdf", StreamType.AdobePDF);
}IronPDF Implementation
IronPDF centralizes page settings in the RenderingOptions with intuitive millimeter-based measurements:
var renderer = new ChromePdfRenderer();
renderer.RenderingOptions.PaperSize = PdfPaperSize.A4;
renderer.RenderingOptions.PaperOrientation = PdfPaperOrientation.Landscape;
renderer.RenderingOptions.MarginTop = 25; // mm
renderer.RenderingOptions.MarginBottom = 25;
renderer.RenderingOptions.MarginLeft = 25;
renderer.RenderingOptions.MarginRight = 25;
var pdf = renderer.RenderHtmlAsPdf(html);
pdf.SaveAs("output.pdf");var renderer = new ChromePdfRenderer();
renderer.RenderingOptions.PaperSize = PdfPaperSize.A4;
renderer.RenderingOptions.PaperOrientation = PdfPaperOrientation.Landscape;
renderer.RenderingOptions.MarginTop = 25; // mm
renderer.RenderingOptions.MarginBottom = 25;
renderer.RenderingOptions.MarginLeft = 25;
renderer.RenderingOptions.MarginRight = 25;
var pdf = renderer.RenderHtmlAsPdf(html);
pdf.SaveAs("output.pdf");Password Protection and Security
Both libraries support PDF security features, but with different API patterns.
TextControl Implementation
using (ServerTextControl tx = new ServerTextControl())
{
tx.Create();
tx.Load(html, StreamType.HTMLFormat);
SaveSettings saveSettings = new SaveSettings();
saveSettings.UserPassword = "user123";
saveSettings.MasterPassword = "owner456";
tx.Save("protected.pdf", StreamType.AdobePDF, saveSettings);
}using (ServerTextControl tx = new ServerTextControl())
{
tx.Create();
tx.Load(html, StreamType.HTMLFormat);
SaveSettings saveSettings = new SaveSettings();
saveSettings.UserPassword = "user123";
saveSettings.MasterPassword = "owner456";
tx.Save("protected.pdf", StreamType.AdobePDF, saveSettings);
}IronPDF Implementation
IronPDF provides granular security control through the SecuritySettings property:
var renderer = new ChromePdfRenderer();
var pdf = renderer.RenderHtmlAsPdf(html);
pdf.SecuritySettings.UserPassword = "user123";
pdf.SecuritySettings.OwnerPassword = "owner456";
pdf.SecuritySettings.AllowUserCopyPasteContent = false;
pdf.SecuritySettings.AllowUserPrinting = PdfPrintSecurity.FullPrintRights;
pdf.SaveAs("protected.pdf");var renderer = new ChromePdfRenderer();
var pdf = renderer.RenderHtmlAsPdf(html);
pdf.SecuritySettings.UserPassword = "user123";
pdf.SecuritySettings.OwnerPassword = "owner456";
pdf.SecuritySettings.AllowUserCopyPasteContent = false;
pdf.SecuritySettings.AllowUserPrinting = PdfPrintSecurity.FullPrintRights;
pdf.SaveAs("protected.pdf");When Teams Consider Alternatives to TextControl
Several scenarios commonly prompt development teams to evaluate alternatives to TextControl:
Cost Optimization
With TextControl licensing starting at $3,398+ per developer and mandatory 40% annual renewals, the three-year total cost of ownership reaches $5,750+ per developer. Teams focused primarily on PDF generation often find this pricing difficult to justify when alternatives exist at significantly lower cost points.
Hardware Compatibility Concerns
The documented Intel Iris Xe Graphics bug affecting 11th generation Intel processors requires registry workarounds for TextControl deployments. IronPDF's Chromium-based rendering eliminates these hardware-specific rendering issues entirely.
PDF-First Requirements
When PDF generation is the primary use case rather than document editing, TextControl's word processor architecture introduces unnecessary complexity. Applications that don't require DOCX editing capabilities or embedded UI controls benefit from IronPDF's focused, PDF-first design.
Modern Web Technology Integration
TextControl's limited CSS and JavaScript support creates challenges for applications using contemporary frontend frameworks. IronPDF's full HTML5, CSS3, and ES2024 JavaScript support ensures accurate rendering of modern web content.
Simplified Deployment
TextControl's ServerTextControl context management and UI component dependencies increase deployment complexity. IronPDF operates as a self-contained NuGet package without external dependencies or complex initialization patterns.
Template and Mail Merge Alternatives
TextControl's proprietary mail merge system uses DOCX templates with merge fields. IronPDF replaces this with standard HTML templating approaches:
// Use standard C# string interpolation
var data = new { CustomerName = "John Doe", InvoiceNumber = "12345", Total = "$1,500.00" };
var html = $@"
<html>
<head>
<style>
body {{ font-family: Arial; padding: 40px; }}
h1 {{ color: #333; }}
.total {{ font-size: 24px; color: green; }}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Invoice #{data.InvoiceNumber}</h1>
<p>Customer: {data.CustomerName}</p>
<p class='total'>Total: {data.Total}</p>
</body>
</html>";
var renderer = new ChromePdfRenderer();
var pdf = renderer.RenderHtmlAsPdf(html);
pdf.SaveAs("invoice.pdf");// Use standard C# string interpolation
var data = new { CustomerName = "John Doe", InvoiceNumber = "12345", Total = "$1,500.00" };
var html = $@"
<html>
<head>
<style>
body {{ font-family: Arial; padding: 40px; }}
h1 {{ color: #333; }}
.total {{ font-size: 24px; color: green; }}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Invoice #{data.InvoiceNumber}</h1>
<p>Customer: {data.CustomerName}</p>
<p class='total'>Total: {data.Total}</p>
</body>
</html>";
var renderer = new ChromePdfRenderer();
var pdf = renderer.RenderHtmlAsPdf(html);
pdf.SaveAs("invoice.pdf");For more complex templating scenarios, IronPDF integrates with Razor engines and other templating frameworks. See the Razor template integration guide for detailed implementation patterns.
.NET Compatibility and Future Readiness
Both libraries support current .NET implementations. IronPDF maintains active development with regular updates, ensuring compatibility with .NET 8, .NET 9, and future releases including .NET 10 expected in 2026. The library's async/await support throughout its API aligns with modern C# development practices, including features available in C# 13 and anticipated C# 14 capabilities.
Additional PDF Capabilities
Beyond generation, IronPDF provides document manipulation features that extend its utility:
- Merging PDFs: Combine multiple documents into single files
- Splitting Documents: Extract page ranges into separate PDFs
- Digital Signatures: Apply cryptographic signatures for document authenticity
- Watermarking: Add text or image watermarks via HTML/CSS
- PDF/A Compliance: Generate archival-standard documents
- Form Filling: Programmatically populate PDF form fields
Conclusion
TX Text Control and IronPDF serve different primary purposes despite both producing PDF output. TextControl excels as a comprehensive document editor with DOCX manipulation and embedded UI controls—ideal for applications requiring rich text editing interfaces alongside document export capabilities.
IronPDF focuses specifically on PDF generation from HTML and web content, providing a streamlined solution for developers who need to convert HTML, URLs, or dynamically generated content to PDF without the overhead of a complete document editing infrastructure. Its Chromium-based rendering ensures pixel-perfect output matching browser display, while its API design prioritizes simplicity and integration with standard web development workflows.
The choice between them depends on project requirements: comprehensive document editing with PDF export favors TextControl, while straightforward PDF generation from web content aligns with IronPDF's strengths. For teams currently using TextControl primarily for PDF generation, evaluating IronPDF may reveal opportunities for significant cost reduction and simplified deployment without sacrificing PDF quality.
For additional implementation guidance, explore the IronPDF documentation and tutorials covering specific use cases and advanced features.