Rotativa vs IronPDF: Technical Comparison Guide
When .NET developers evaluate PDF generation solutions, Rotativa and IronPDF represent fundamentally different approaches with distinct architectural foundations and maintenance trajectories. Rotativa leverages the wkhtmltopdf tool to convert HTML content into PDF format within ASP.NET MVC applications, while IronPDF provides a modern Chromium-based rendering engine compatible with all .NET project types. This technical comparison examines both libraries across the dimensions that matter most to professional developers and architects making PDF generation decisions for .NET applications in 2025 and beyond.
Understanding Rotativa
Rotativa is an open-source library specifically designed for ASP.NET MVC applications. It wraps the wkhtmltopdf command-line tool to convert HTML content into PDF format. The library provides MVC-specific action result types like ViewAsPdf and UrlAsPdf that integrate directly with the MVC controller pattern.
At its core, Rotativa uses wkhtmltopdf's Qt WebKit 4.8 rendering engine from 2012. This means the library cannot render modern CSS features like Flexbox or CSS Grid, and JavaScript execution is unreliable with no ES6+ support.
Critical Consideration: Rotativa has not received updates or maintenance for years. The underlying wkhtmltopdf was officially abandoned in December 2022, and the maintainers explicitly stated they will not fix security vulnerabilities. This includes CVE-2022-35583, a critical Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability with a severity rating of 9.8/10.
Understanding IronPDF
IronPDF provides a modern, Chromium-based PDF generation solution for .NET applications. The library works with any .NET project type including ASP.NET MVC, Razor Pages, Blazor, minimal APIs, console applications, and desktop projects.
IronPDF's architecture separates HTML rendering from PDF generation, providing more flexibility in how developers structure their applications. The ChromePdfRenderer class handles all conversion operations with full support for modern CSS3, JavaScript ES6+, and async/await patterns.
Security Comparison
The security posture of these libraries differs dramatically:
| Risk | Rotativa | IronPDF |
|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-35583 (SSRF) | Vulnerable | Protected |
| Local File Access | Vulnerable | Sandboxed |
| Internal Network Access | Vulnerable | Restricted |
| Security Patches | Never (abandoned) | Regular updates |
| Active Development | Abandoned | Monthly releases |
The CVE-2022-35583 vulnerability allows attackers to access internal network resources, cloud metadata endpoints, and sensitive configuration through crafted HTML content. Because wkhtmltopdf will never be patched, every application using Rotativa remains permanently exposed to this critical vulnerability.
Project Compatibility
Rotativa's most significant limitation is its exclusive focus on ASP.NET MVC:
| Feature | Rotativa | IronPDF |
|---|---|---|
| ASP.NET MVC | Yes | Yes |
| Razor Pages | Not supported | Supported |
| Blazor | Not supported | Supported |
| Minimal APIs | Not supported | Supported |
| Console Applications | Not supported | Supported |
| Desktop Applications | Not supported | Supported |
Rotativa was designed for ASP.NET MVC 5 and earlier, relying on the controller action result pattern. This architecture makes it unsuitable for modern .NET Core applications using Razor Pages, Blazor, or minimal APIs.
HTML to PDF Conversion
The code patterns for HTML-to-PDF conversion reveal fundamental architectural differences.
Rotativa HTML Conversion
Rotativa requires the MVC controller context and uses action result patterns:
// NuGet: Install-Package Rotativa.Core
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc;
using Rotativa.AspNetCore;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
namespace RotativaExample
{
public class PdfController : Controller
{
public async Task<IActionResult> GeneratePdf()
{
var htmlContent = "<h1>Hello World</h1><p>This is a PDF document.</p>";
// Rotativa requires returning a ViewAsPdf result from MVC controller
return new ViewAsPdf()
{
ViewName = "PdfView",
PageSize = Rotativa.AspNetCore.Options.Size.A4
};
}
}
}// NuGet: Install-Package Rotativa.Core
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc;
using Rotativa.AspNetCore;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
namespace RotativaExample
{
public class PdfController : Controller
{
public async Task<IActionResult> GeneratePdf()
{
var htmlContent = "<h1>Hello World</h1><p>This is a PDF document.</p>";
// Rotativa requires returning a ViewAsPdf result from MVC controller
return new ViewAsPdf()
{
ViewName = "PdfView",
PageSize = Rotativa.AspNetCore.Options.Size.A4
};
}
}
}Rotativa's approach ties PDF generation to MVC views and controllers. The ViewAsPdf action result renders a Razor view and converts it to PDF, but cannot accept raw HTML strings directly without a view.
IronPDF HTML Conversion
IronPDF provides direct HTML string conversion without requiring MVC context:
// NuGet: Install-Package IronPdf
using IronPdf;
using System;
namespace IronPdfExample
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var renderer = new ChromePdfRenderer();
var htmlContent = "<h1>Hello World</h1><p>This is a PDF document.</p>";
var pdf = renderer.RenderHtmlAsPdf(htmlContent);
pdf.SaveAs("output.pdf");
Console.WriteLine("PDF generated successfully!");
}
}
}// NuGet: Install-Package IronPdf
using IronPdf;
using System;
namespace IronPdfExample
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var renderer = new ChromePdfRenderer();
var htmlContent = "<h1>Hello World</h1><p>This is a PDF document.</p>";
var pdf = renderer.RenderHtmlAsPdf(htmlContent);
pdf.SaveAs("output.pdf");
Console.WriteLine("PDF generated successfully!");
}
}
}The RenderHtmlAsPdf method accepts HTML content directly, enabling PDF generation from any application context—console applications, background services, or web applications of any type.
URL to PDF Conversion
Converting live web pages to PDF demonstrates how each library handles navigation and rendering.
Rotativa URL Conversion
// NuGet: Install-Package Rotativa.Core
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc;
using Rotativa.AspNetCore;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
namespace RotativaExample
{
public class UrlPdfController : Controller
{
public async Task<IActionResult> ConvertUrlToPdf()
{
// Rotativa works within MVC framework and returns ActionResult
return new UrlAsPdf("https://www.example.com")
{
FileName = "webpage.pdf",
PageSize = Rotativa.AspNetCore.Options.Size.A4,
PageOrientation = Rotativa.AspNetCore.Options.Orientation.Portrait
};
}
}
}// NuGet: Install-Package Rotativa.Core
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc;
using Rotativa.AspNetCore;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
namespace RotativaExample
{
public class UrlPdfController : Controller
{
public async Task<IActionResult> ConvertUrlToPdf()
{
// Rotativa works within MVC framework and returns ActionResult
return new UrlAsPdf("https://www.example.com")
{
FileName = "webpage.pdf",
PageSize = Rotativa.AspNetCore.Options.Size.A4,
PageOrientation = Rotativa.AspNetCore.Options.Orientation.Portrait
};
}
}
}Rotativa's UrlAsPdf result type requires the MVC controller context and returns an action result. Note that URL rendering through wkhtmltopdf exposes the SSRF vulnerability, allowing attackers to potentially access internal network resources.
IronPDF URL Conversion
// NuGet: Install-Package IronPdf
using IronPdf;
using System;
namespace IronPdfExample
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var renderer = new ChromePdfRenderer();
var pdf = renderer.RenderUrlAsPdf("https://www.example.com");
pdf.SaveAs("webpage.pdf");
Console.WriteLine("URL converted to PDF successfully!");
}
}
}// NuGet: Install-Package IronPdf
using IronPdf;
using System;
namespace IronPdfExample
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var renderer = new ChromePdfRenderer();
var pdf = renderer.RenderUrlAsPdf("https://www.example.com");
pdf.SaveAs("webpage.pdf");
Console.WriteLine("URL converted to PDF successfully!");
}
}
}IronPDF's RenderUrlAsPdf method operates independently of any web framework, with built-in security restrictions that prevent SSRF attacks.
Headers and Footers Implementation
Document headers and footers demonstrate significant API design differences.
Rotativa Headers and Footers
Rotativa uses command-line switches passed as strings:
// NuGet: Install-Package Rotativa.Core
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc;
using Rotativa.AspNetCore;
using Rotativa.AspNetCore.Options;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
namespace RotativaExample
{
public class HeaderFooterController : Controller
{
public async Task<IActionResult> GeneratePdfWithHeaderFooter()
{
return new ViewAsPdf("Report")
{
PageSize = Size.A4,
PageMargins = new Margins(20, 10, 20, 10),
CustomSwitches = "--header-center \"Page Header\" --footer-center \"Page [page] of [toPage]\""
};
}
}
}// NuGet: Install-Package Rotativa.Core
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc;
using Rotativa.AspNetCore;
using Rotativa.AspNetCore.Options;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
namespace RotativaExample
{
public class HeaderFooterController : Controller
{
public async Task<IActionResult> GeneratePdfWithHeaderFooter()
{
return new ViewAsPdf("Report")
{
PageSize = Size.A4,
PageMargins = new Margins(20, 10, 20, 10),
CustomSwitches = "--header-center \"Page Header\" --footer-center \"Page [page] of [toPage]\""
};
}
}
}The CustomSwitches property passes raw command-line arguments to wkhtmltopdf. This approach lacks type safety, IntelliSense support, and compile-time checking. Errors in the switch syntax only appear at runtime.
IronPDF Headers and Footers
IronPDF provides typed properties for header and footer configuration:
// NuGet: Install-Package IronPdf
using IronPdf;
using IronPdf.Rendering;
using System;
namespace IronPdfExample
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var renderer = new ChromePdfRenderer();
renderer.RenderingOptions.TextHeader = new TextHeaderFooter()
{
CenterText = "Page Header",
DrawDividerLine = true
};
renderer.RenderingOptions.TextFooter = new TextHeaderFooter()
{
CenterText = "Page {page} of {total-pages}",
DrawDividerLine = true
};
var htmlContent = "<h1>Report Title</h1><p>Report content goes here.</p>";
var pdf = renderer.RenderHtmlAsPdf(htmlContent);
pdf.SaveAs("report.pdf");
Console.WriteLine("PDF with headers and footers created successfully!");
}
}
}// NuGet: Install-Package IronPdf
using IronPdf;
using IronPdf.Rendering;
using System;
namespace IronPdfExample
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var renderer = new ChromePdfRenderer();
renderer.RenderingOptions.TextHeader = new TextHeaderFooter()
{
CenterText = "Page Header",
DrawDividerLine = true
};
renderer.RenderingOptions.TextFooter = new TextHeaderFooter()
{
CenterText = "Page {page} of {total-pages}",
DrawDividerLine = true
};
var htmlContent = "<h1>Report Title</h1><p>Report content goes here.</p>";
var pdf = renderer.RenderHtmlAsPdf(htmlContent);
pdf.SaveAs("report.pdf");
Console.WriteLine("PDF with headers and footers created successfully!");
}
}
}IronPDF's TextHeaderFooter class provides IntelliSense support, compile-time type checking, and clear property names. The placeholder syntax differs: Rotativa uses [page] and [toPage] while IronPDF uses {page} and {total-pages}.
Placeholder Syntax Reference
| Rotativa Placeholder | IronPDF Placeholder |
|---|---|
[page] | {page} |
[topage] | {total-pages} |
[date] | {date} |
[time] | {time} |
[title] | {html-title} |
[sitepage] | {url} |
Feature Comparison Matrix
| Feature | Rotativa | IronPDF |
|---|---|---|
| Security | Critical CVEs (unpatched) | No vulnerabilities |
| HTML Rendering | Outdated WebKit (2012) | Modern Chromium |
| CSS3 | Partial support | Supported |
| Flexbox/Grid | Not supported | Supported |
| JavaScript | Unreliable | Full ES6+ |
| ASP.NET Core | Limited ports | Native support |
| Razor Pages | Not supported | Supported |
| Blazor | Not supported | Supported |
| PDF Manipulation | Not available | Supported |
| Digital Signatures | Not available | Supported |
| PDF/A Compliance | Not available | Supported |
| Async/Await | Synchronous only | Full async |
| Active Maintenance | Abandoned | Weekly updates |
API Mapping Reference
Teams evaluating Rotativa migration to IronPDF can reference this mapping of equivalent operations:
| Rotativa Class | IronPDF Equivalent |
|---|---|
ViewAsPdf | ChromePdfRenderer |
ActionAsPdf | ChromePdfRenderer.RenderUrlAsPdf() |
UrlAsPdf | ChromePdfRenderer.RenderUrlAsPdf() |
Orientation enum | PdfPaperOrientation enum |
Size enum | PdfPaperSize enum |
Margins | RenderingOptions.Margin* |
CustomSwitches | RenderingOptions.* |
The Threading Problem
Rotativa inherits wkhtmltopdf's threading limitations:
// Rotativa - Blocks the thread
public ActionResult GeneratePdf()
{
return new ViewAsPdf("Report");
// This blocks the request thread until PDF is complete
// Poor scalability under load
}// Rotativa - Blocks the thread
public ActionResult GeneratePdf()
{
return new ViewAsPdf("Report");
// This blocks the request thread until PDF is complete
// Poor scalability under load
}IronPDF provides full async support:
// IronPDF - Full async support
public async Task<IActionResult> GeneratePdf()
{
var renderer = new ChromePdfRenderer();
var pdf = await renderer.RenderHtmlAsPdfAsync(html);
return File(pdf.BinaryData, "application/pdf");
// Non-blocking, better scalability
}// IronPDF - Full async support
public async Task<IActionResult> GeneratePdf()
{
var renderer = new ChromePdfRenderer();
var pdf = await renderer.RenderHtmlAsPdfAsync(html);
return File(pdf.BinaryData, "application/pdf");
// Non-blocking, better scalability
}The synchronous-only pattern in Rotativa blocks request threads, reducing application scalability under load. IronPDF's async support enables better resource utilization in high-throughput scenarios.
Deployment Considerations
Rotativa requires managing wkhtmltopdf binaries across deployment environments:
- Different binaries for x86/x64/Linux/Mac platforms
- Manual PATH environment configuration
- Security vulnerabilities in all binary versions
- Docker images must include wkhtmltopdf installation
IronPDF simplifies deployment through NuGet packaging without external binary management.
When Teams Consider Rotativa Migration
Several factors prompt development teams to evaluate alternatives to Rotativa:
Security requirements become critical when vulnerability scanners flag CVE-2022-35583. Because wkhtmltopdf will never be patched, organizations subject to security audits or compliance requirements must migrate away from Rotativa.
Modern .NET adoption creates incompatibility when teams move to Razor Pages, Blazor, or minimal APIs. Rotativa's MVC-only architecture cannot support these modern patterns.
CSS rendering limitations affect document quality when designs use Flexbox or CSS Grid. Rotativa's outdated WebKit engine from 2012 cannot render these layouts correctly.
JavaScript reliability impacts dynamic content rendering. Complex JavaScript that works in browsers often fails or renders incorrectly with wkhtmltopdf's limited JavaScript support.
Async scalability matters for high-throughput applications. Rotativa's synchronous-only pattern blocks threads, while IronPDF supports full async/await for better resource utilization.
Strengths and Trade-offs
Rotativa Strengths
- Simple MVC integration for basic use cases
- Open source (MIT License)
- Familiar pattern for legacy MVC applications
- No commercial licensing costs
Rotativa Limitations
- ASP.NET MVC only—no Razor Pages, Blazor, or minimal APIs
- Abandoned—no updates or maintenance
- Critical security vulnerabilities that will never be patched
- Outdated WebKit rendering engine (2012)
- No Flexbox or CSS Grid support
- Unreliable JavaScript execution
- Synchronous only—poor scalability
- No PDF manipulation capabilities
- No digital signatures or PDF/A compliance
IronPDF Strengths
- Works with any .NET project type
- Modern Chromium rendering with full CSS3/JavaScript support
- Actively maintained with regular security updates
- Full async/await support
- Comprehensive PDF manipulation features
- Digital signatures and security
- PDF/A archival compliance
- Professional support and documentation
IronPDF Considerations
- Commercial licensing model
- Requires license key initialization
Conclusion
Rotativa provided a straightforward solution for PDF generation in ASP.NET MVC applications when it was actively maintained. However, the library's abandonment, combined with critical unpatched security vulnerabilities in its wkhtmltopdf foundation, creates significant risk for production applications.
For teams currently using Rotativa, the combination of security vulnerabilities, MVC-only architecture, and outdated rendering capabilities presents compelling reasons to evaluate alternatives. For new projects targeting .NET 10 and C# 14 in 2026, Rotativa's architecture cannot support modern patterns like Razor Pages, Blazor, or minimal APIs.
IronPDF addresses these limitations with a modern Chromium rendering engine, cross-platform .NET compatibility, active maintenance, and comprehensive PDF manipulation capabilities that Rotativa never offered. The migration path from Rotativa to IronPDF primarily involves replacing MVC action results with direct ChromePdfRenderer calls and updating placeholder syntax in headers and footers.
For implementation guidance, explore the IronPDF ASP.NET Core tutorial and documentation covering PDF generation patterns for modern .NET applications.