using IronOcr; using IronSoftware.Drawing; // We can delve deep into OCR results as an object model of // Pages, Barcodes, Paragraphs, Lines, Words and Characters // This allows us to explore, export and draw OCR content using other APIs/ var ocrTesseract = new IronTesseract(); ocrTesseract.Configuration.ReadBarCodes = true; using var ocrInput = new OcrInput(); var pages = new int[] { 1, 2 }; ocrInput.LoadImageFrames("example.tiff", pages); OcrResult ocrResult = ocrTesseract.Read(ocrInput); foreach (var page in ocrResult.Pages) { // Page object int PageNumber = page.PageNumber; string PageText = page.Text; int PageWordCount = page.WordCount; // null if we dont set Ocr.Configuration.ReadBarCodes = true; OcrResult.Barcode[] Barcodes = page.Barcodes; AnyBitmap PageImage = page.ToBitmap(ocrInput); double PageWidth = page.Width; double PageHeight = page.Height; double PageRotation = page.Rotation; // angular correction in degrees from OcrInput.Deskew() foreach (var paragraph in page.Paragraphs) { // Pages -> Paragraphs int ParagraphNumber = paragraph.ParagraphNumber; string ParagraphText = paragraph.Text; AnyBitmap ParagraphImage = paragraph.ToBitmap(ocrInput); int ParagraphX_location = paragraph.X; int ParagraphY_location = paragraph.Y; int ParagraphWidth = paragraph.Width; int ParagraphHeight = paragraph.Height; double ParagraphOcrAccuracy = paragraph.Confidence; OcrResult.TextFlow paragrapthText_direction = paragraph.TextDirection; foreach (var line in paragraph.Lines) { // Pages -> Paragraphs -> Lines int LineNumber = line.LineNumber; string LineText = line.Text; AnyBitmap LineImage = line.ToBitmap(ocrInput); int LineX_location = line.X; int LineY_location = line.Y; int LineWidth = line.Width; int LineHeight = line.Height; double LineOcrAccuracy = line.Confidence; double LineSkew = line.BaselineAngle; double LineOffset = line.BaselineOffset; foreach (var word in line.Words) { // Pages -> Paragraphs -> Lines -> Words int WordNumber = word.WordNumber; string WordText = word.Text; AnyBitmap WordImage = word.ToBitmap(ocrInput); int WordX_location = word.X; int WordY_location = word.Y; int WordWidth = word.Width; int WordHeight = word.Height; double WordOcrAccuracy = word.Confidence; foreach (var character in word.Characters) { // Pages -> Paragraphs -> Lines -> Words -> Characters int CharacterNumber = character.CharacterNumber; string CharacterText = character.Text; AnyBitmap CharacterImage = character.ToBitmap(ocrInput); int CharacterX_location = character.X; int CharacterY_location = character.Y; int CharacterWidth = character.Width; int CharacterHeight = character.Height; double CharacterOcrAccuracy = character.Confidence; // Output alternative symbols choices and their probability. // Very useful for spellchecking OcrResult.Choice[] Choices = character.Choices; } } } } }

COMPARE TO OTHER COMPONENTS

iOS OCR Library (Free, and Paid Tools Comparison)

Published September 29, 2024

Optical Character Recognition (OCR) is a crucial technology in various applications, from digitizing documents to extracting recognized text from images. When it comes to iOS development, choosing the proper OCR library is essential to ensure accuracy, performance, and ease of integration.

In this article, I'll compare five popular OCR libraries for iOS: Tesseract OCR, Google Cloud Vision OCR, ABBYY FineReader SDK, SwiftOCR, and with a particular focus on IronOCR.iOS.

Introduction to iOS OCR Libraries
Tesseract iOS OCR
Google Cloud Vision OCR
ABBYY FineReader SDK
SwiftOCR
IronOCR.iOS
Conclusion

1. Introduction to iOS OCR Libraries

In the world of iOS app development, the ability to accurately recognize text from images is a powerful feature that can be integrated into various applications, from scanning business cards to processing printed documents. Implementing OCR (Optical Character Recognition) in your iOS app involves choosing the proper iOS OCR library to handle text extraction efficiently. Popular tools like the Vision framework, Tesseract library, and other OCR software offer different levels of text recognition accuracy, language support, and ease of integration.

Whether you're working on a project that requires recognizing text from scanned PDFs, detecting fonts, or extracting strings from images, understanding how to use these libraries is crucial. Some libraries provide default options for recognizing text in multiple languages, while others offer advanced features like neural network-based recognition and error correction.

We'll evaluate each library based on the following:

Key features
Ease of use
Performance
Quality and availability of support
Price and licensing terms

In this detailed review, we'll explore the capabilities of various iOS OCR libraries, discussing how they process request objects, recognize text, deliver OCR results, and integrate with different parts of your app, such as business card scanning or document processing. Whether new to OCR or looking to optimize your existing code, this article will help you navigate the options and choose the best OCR library for your needs.

2. Tesseract OCR iOS

One of the most widely used open-source OCR engines is Tesseract OCR. It supports many languages and can handle complex scripts, making it versatile for various applications. Tesseract is highly customizable, allowing developers to fine-tune it for specific use cases. It supports multiple output formats, including plain text, OCR, and searchable PDFs.

iOS OCR Library (Free, and Paid Tools Comparison): Figure 1 - Tesseract OCR IOS github homepage

Ease of Use

Tesseract OCR requires significant customization to achieve optimal results. It doesn't have a native iOS SDK, so integration with iOS typically involves using third-party wrappers or frameworks like SwiftOCR or Xamarin. Developers with experience working with open-source tools and those comfortable with command-line interfaces will find it manageable, but it may present a steep learning curve for beginners. One such project was done by Gali8; you can access it on GitHub from here.

Performance

Tesseract OCR offers solid performance but may struggle with low-quality images or complex layouts. It's not as fast as some commercial OCR engines, and optimizing it for speed and accuracy often requires extensive tweaking.

Quality and Availability of Support

As an open-source project, Tesseract OCR benefits from a large and active community. However, official support is limited, and developers may need to rely on community forums and GitHub issues for troubleshooting. The documentation is extensive, but finding your way around can be difficult.

Price and Licensing Terms

Tesseract OCR is free and open-source, licensed under the Apache License 2.0. This makes it an attractive option for developers on a budget or those working on open-source projects. However, lacking official support may necessitate additional development time and resources.

When to Use Tesseract OCR

Tesseract OCR best suits developers looking for a powerful, customizable, and cost-effective OCR solution. It's ideal for projects where budget constraints are a priority and when the development team has the expertise to handle customization and optimization.

3. Google Cloud Vision OCR

Google Cloud Vision OCR is part of Google's suite of AI tools and offers robust text recognition capabilities. It supports many languages and can handle complex layouts, such as multi-column documents and handwritten text. Additionally, it integrates seamlessly with other Google Cloud services, making it a comprehensive solution for developers already in the Google ecosystem.

iOS OCR Library (Free, and Paid Tools Comparison): Figure 2 - Google Cloud Vision OCR guide

Ease of Use

Google Cloud Vision OCR is easy to use, with simple REST API calls that can be integrated into any iOS application. The API is well-documented, and Google provides extensive guides and examples to help developers get started quickly. However, the service requires an internet connection, which processes images in the cloud.

Performance

The performance of Google Cloud Vision OCR is top-notch, with high accuracy and fast processing times. The cloud-based nature of the service allows it to leverage Google's robust infrastructure, ensuring consistent results even with large or complex datasets.

Quality and Availability of Support

Google provides comprehensive support for its Cloud Vision OCR, including detailed documentation, online forums, and direct support options for enterprise customers. The availability of resources and official support makes it a reliable choice for developers.

Price and Licensing Terms

Google Cloud Vision OCR operates on a pay-as-you-go pricing model, which can be cost-effective for smaller projects but may become expensive for applications with high OCR demands. Developers should consider their budget and expected usage before committing to this service.

When to Use Google Cloud Vision OCR

Google Cloud Vision OCR is ideal for developers needing a reliable, accurate, easy-to-use OCR solution, mainly if they already use other Google Cloud services. It's best for projects with guaranteed internet connectivity, and the budget allows for potential scaling costs.

4. ABBYY FineReader SDK

ABBYY FineReader SDK is a premium OCR library known for its exceptional accuracy and advanced features. It supports over 200 languages and can handle complex layouts, including multi-column text and images with mixed content. ABBYY also provides advanced image preprocessing options, making it suitable for high-quality document digitization.

iOS OCR Library (Free, and Paid Tools Comparison): Figure 3 - ABBYY FineReader SDK homepage

Ease of Use

ABBYY FineReader SDK is designed for enterprise-level applications, and its comprehensive feature set reflects this focus. While powerful, it comes with a steeper learning curve than other libraries, and integration may require more effort. However, ABBYY provides extensive documentation and support to help developers navigate its complexities. You can check its API reference for iOS over here.

Performance

ABBYY FineReader SDK offers outstanding performance, particularly in terms of accuracy. It excels in recognizing text in challenging conditions, such as low-quality scans or documents with intricate layouts. The SDK is optimized for speed, making it suitable for high-throughput OCR processing applications.

Quality and Availability of Support

ABBYY provides high-quality support, including dedicated customer service, detailed documentation, and a knowledge base. Enterprise customers can also access personalized support options, ensuring issues are resolved quickly and effectively.

Price and Licensing Terms

ABBYY FineReader SDK is a commercial product whose pricing reflects its premium positioning. Licensing costs can be substantial, especially for enterprise use, but the investment is justified by its superior accuracy and performance. ABBYY offers various licensing models to cater to different business needs.

When to Use ABBYY FineReader SDK

ABBYY FineReader SDK is best suited for enterprise applications where accuracy is paramount, and the budget allows for a premium solution. It's ideal for businesses requiring high-quality OCR processing for large volumes of documents or advanced features beyond essential text recognition.

5. SwiftOCR

SwiftOCR is a lightweight OCR library specifically designed for iOS. It is a pure Swift implementation of the Tesseract OCR engine, optimized for iOS applications. SwiftOCR provides basic text recognition capabilities and easily integrates into Swift projects.

iOS OCR Library (Free, and Paid Tools Comparison): Figure 4 - SwiftOCR github page

Ease of Use

SwiftOCR is relatively easy to use, especially for developers familiar with Swift. Its native implementation ensures seamless integration with iOS projects and requires no external dependencies. However, it lacks advanced features in other libraries, making it more suitable for more straightforward OCR tasks.

Performance

SwiftOCR offers decent performance for basic OCR tasks. While it's not as powerful or accurate as some other libraries on this list, it's optimized for speed and works well for applications that don't require complex text recognition.

Quality and Availability of Support

SwiftOCR is an open-source project with limited official support. Developers will need to rely on community resources and forums for assistance. While the community is active, the level of support may not be sufficient for more complex or demanding projects.

Price and Licensing Terms

SwiftOCR is free and open-source, licensed under the MIT License. This makes it an attractive option for developers looking for a cost-effective solution for simple OCR tasks on iOS.

When to Use SwiftOCR

SwiftOCR is best suited for developers working on smaller iOS projects that require basic OCR functionality. It's an excellent choice for those who need a lightweight, easy-to-integrate solution without the need for advanced features or extensive support. Although deprecated, this project can still be utilized for more straightforward OCR tasks. For fast, accurate, and much less finicky OCR capabilities in iOS, please refer to Apple's Vision Framework.

6. IronOCR.iOS

IronOCR.iOS is a robust OCR library explicitly designed for .NET developers working on iOS. It supports various image formats and offers advanced image correction filters like Deskew, Denoise, and Binarize. IronOCR.iOS also includes a performance-tuned version of the Tesseract OCR engine, providing high accuracy and reliability.

iOS OCR Library (Free, and Paid Tools Comparison): Figure 5 - IronOCR NuGet Trial Banner Image

IronOCR is a professional-grade C# library designed for high-accuracy Optical Character Recognition, and IronOCR.iOS is specifically built to extend this capability to iOS apps within a cross-platform environment like MAUI. This specialized version maintains the original IronOCR's robust performance and advanced image correction features, making it an excellent choice for developers who need reliable text recognition in iOS apps.

iOS OCR Library (Free, and Paid Tools Comparison): Figure 6 - IronOCR Cross Platform Compatibility Support Image

Its seamless integration with .NET and cross-platform support ensures developers can implement powerful OCR functionality across different platforms with minimal effort. IronOCR.iOS stands out for its ease of use, high accuracy, and comprehensive support, making it a top choice for developers in a cross-platform ecosystem.

Ease of Use

IronOCR.iOS is designed for ease of use. Its API is straightforward, making it easy for developers to integrate OCR functionality into their iOS applications. The library is well-documented, and Iron Software provides extensive guides and examples to help developers start quickly and implement OCR.

Performance

IronOCR.iOS delivers excellent performance with high accuracy and fast processing times. The library is optimized for iOS, ensuring it can handle various OCR tasks efficiently. Its advanced image correction features also help improve accuracy, particularly with low-quality images.

Quality and Availability of Support

Iron Software offers comprehensive support for IronOCR.iOS, including detailed documentation, a knowledge base, and responsive customer service. Developers can also access live chat support, making it easy to get help when needed.

Price and Licensing Terms

IronOCR.iOS is a commercial product with flexible licensing to test out the entire range of the library with absolutely no cost, making it a go-to library for developers.

When to Use IronOCR.iOS

IronOCR.iOS is ideal for developers who need a powerful, easy-to-use OCR library with cross-platform support. It's particularly well-suited for .NET developers working on iOS projects, offering a balanced mix of features, performance, and support.

7. Conclusion

Choosing the suitable OCR library for your iOS project depends on various factors, including your specific use case, budget, and technical requirements. In my opinion, I found IronOCR.iOS is slightly a better choice, especially for building apps with cross-platform support. Here are my final thoughts on each iOS OCR library:

Tesseract OCR is an excellent choice for developers looking for a powerful, open-source solution with a large community that may require significant customization.
Google Cloud Vision OCR offers a seamless, easy-to-use, high-accuracy option ideal for developers already within the Google ecosystem.
ABBYY FineReader SDK is best suited for enterprise applications where accuracy is paramount, though it comes with a higher price tag and a steeper learning curve.
SwiftOCR provides a lightweight and cost-effective solution for basic OCR tasks on iOS, making it ideal for smaller projects.
IronOCR.iOS offers a balanced approach with almost every functionality and a focus on ease of use, high accuracy, and strong support, making it an excellent choice for developers who need a reliable and robust OCR solution for iOS.

Comparison of Key Features Between iOS OCR Libraries

iOS OCR Library (Free, and Paid Tools Comparison): Figure 7

Each library offers something unique, and the best choice will depend on your project's specific needs. Consider your priorities regarding ease of use, accuracy, speed, support, price, and licensing to make an informed decision.

NEXT >
Paddle OCR vs Tesseract (OCR Features Comparison)